Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Accountants And Auditors Salary: Michigan vs Washington

Accountants And Auditors earn a median of $77,720 in Michigan and $96,180 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $18,460 (-19.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,720
Michigan median
$80,776 after COL
$96,180
Washington median
$89,877 after COL
-19.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-10.1%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $18,460 more per year than Michigan for accountants and auditors, a gap of +19.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,101 of extra purchasing power (+10.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for accountants and auditors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Accountants And Auditors

Michigan

Median salary
$77,720
Mean salary
$85,460
Employment
43,910
Location quotient
1.06
Jobs per 1,000
10.0
COL-adjusted median
$80,776
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for Michigan →

Accountants And Auditors

Washington

Median salary
$96,180
Mean salary
$101,380
Employment
37,400
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
10.6
COL-adjusted median
$89,877
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into accountants and auditors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.