Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Actuaries Salary: Kansas vs District of Columbia

Actuaries earn a median of $125,690 in Kansas and $153,340 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $27,650 (-18.0%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$125,690
Kansas median
$139,550 after COL
$153,340
District of Columbia median
$139,526 after COL
-18.0%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
+0.0%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $27,650 more per year than Kansas for actuaries, a gap of +18.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Kansas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $25 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for actuaries in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Actuaries

Kansas

Median salary
$125,690
Mean salary
$135,270
Employment
310
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$139,550
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Actuaries page for Kansas →

Actuaries

District of Columbia

Median salary
$153,340
Mean salary
$151,770
Employment
200
Location quotient
1.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$139,526
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Actuaries page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into actuaries from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.