Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Actuaries Salary: Washington vs Connecticut

Actuaries earn a median of $153,260 in Washington and $148,220 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $5,040 (+3.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$153,260
Washington median
$143,216 after COL
$148,220
Connecticut median
$143,056 after COL
+3.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+0.1%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $5,040 more per year than Connecticut for actuaries, a gap of +3.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $161 of extra purchasing power (+0.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for actuaries in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Actuaries

Washington

Median salary
$153,260
Mean salary
$147,630
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$143,216
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Actuaries page for Washington →

Actuaries

Connecticut

Median salary
$148,220
Mean salary
$152,210
Employment
1,190
Location quotient
3.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$143,056
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Actuaries page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into actuaries from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.