Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Administrative Services Managers Salary: Alaska vs Minnesota

Administrative Services Managers earn a median of $102,610 in Alaska and $135,050 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $32,440 (-24.0%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$102,610
Alaska median
$100,245 after COL
$135,050
Minnesota median
$136,938 after COL
-24.0%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-26.8%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $32,440 more per year than Alaska for administrative services managers, a gap of +24.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $36,693 of extra purchasing power (+26.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for administrative services managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Administrative Services Managers

Alaska

Median salary
$102,610
Mean salary
$114,060
Employment
910
Location quotient
1.72
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$100,245
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Administrative Services Managers page for Alaska →

Administrative Services Managers

Minnesota

Median salary
$135,050
Mean salary
$154,370
Employment
6,010
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$136,938
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Administrative Services Managers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into administrative services managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.