Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Agricultural Technicians Salary: North Dakota vs California

Agricultural Technicians earn a median of $44,540 in North Dakota and $58,330 in California. That is a nominal gap of $13,790 (-23.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,540
North Dakota median
$50,068 after COL
$58,330
California median
$52,682 after COL
-23.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
-5.0%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $13,790 more per year than North Dakota for agricultural technicians, a gap of +23.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,614 of extra purchasing power (+5.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Technicians

North Dakota

Median salary
$44,540
Mean salary
$49,780
Employment
120
Location quotient
3.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$50,068
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Technicians page for North Dakota →

Agricultural Technicians

California

Median salary
$58,330
Mean salary
$56,040
Employment
3,100
Location quotient
1.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$52,682
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Technicians page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.