Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Agricultural Technicians Salary: Vermont vs Arizona

Agricultural Technicians earn a median of $39,940 in Vermont and $63,340 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $23,400 (-36.9%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,940
Vermont median
$40,773 after COL
$63,340
Arizona median
$62,914 after COL
-36.9%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
-35.2%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $23,400 more per year than Vermont for agricultural technicians, a gap of +36.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,141 of extra purchasing power (+35.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Technicians

Vermont

Median salary
$39,940
Mean salary
$44,350
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$40,773
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Technicians page for Vermont →

Agricultural Technicians

Arizona

Median salary
$63,340
Mean salary
$60,590
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$62,914
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Technicians page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.