Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Air Traffic Controllers Salary: Idaho vs Georgia

Air Traffic Controllers earn a median of $117,150 in Idaho and $174,600 in Georgia. That is a nominal gap of $57,450 (-32.9%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$117,150
Idaho median
$122,678 after COL
$174,600
Georgia median
$181,322 after COL
-32.9%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
-32.3%
Adjusted gap
Georgia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $57,450 more per year than Idaho for air traffic controllers, a gap of +32.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Georgia still comes out ahead, with roughly $58,644 of extra purchasing power (+32.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for air traffic controllers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Air Traffic Controllers

Idaho

Median salary
$117,150
Mean salary
$118,390
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$122,678
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Idaho →

Air Traffic Controllers

Georgia

Median salary
$174,600
Mean salary
$157,770
Employment
970
Location quotient
1.38
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$181,322
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Georgia →

Related pages

Keep digging into air traffic controllers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.