Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Air Traffic Controllers Salary: Kansas vs Texas

Air Traffic Controllers earn a median of $156,620 in Kansas and $167,710 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $11,090 (-6.6%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$156,620
Kansas median
$173,891 after COL
$167,710
Texas median
$172,795 after COL
-6.6%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
+0.6%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $11,090 more per year than Kansas for air traffic controllers, a gap of +6.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Kansas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,095 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for air traffic controllers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Air Traffic Controllers

Kansas

Median salary
$156,620
Mean salary
$148,420
Employment
410
Location quotient
1.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$173,891
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Kansas →

Air Traffic Controllers

Texas

Median salary
$167,710
Mean salary
$155,660
Employment
2,020
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$172,795
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into air traffic controllers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.