Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Air Traffic Controllers Salary: Wisconsin vs Colorado

Air Traffic Controllers earn a median of $106,750 in Wisconsin and $172,310 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $65,560 (-38.0%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$106,750
Wisconsin median
$113,449 after COL
$172,310
Colorado median
$167,207 after COL
-38.0%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-32.2%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $65,560 more per year than Wisconsin for air traffic controllers, a gap of +38.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $53,758 of extra purchasing power (+32.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for air traffic controllers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Air Traffic Controllers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$106,750
Mean salary
$108,330
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$113,449
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Wisconsin →

Air Traffic Controllers

Colorado

Median salary
$172,310
Mean salary
$153,010
Employment
780
Location quotient
1.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$167,207
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Air Traffic Controllers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into air traffic controllers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.