Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors Salary: Michigan vs Utah

Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors earn a median of $71,250 in Michigan and $78,990 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $7,740 (-9.8%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$71,250
Michigan median
$74,051 after COL
$78,990
Utah median
$79,898 after COL
-9.8%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-7.3%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $7,740 more per year than Michigan for aircraft cargo handling supervisors, a gap of +9.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,846 of extra purchasing power (+7.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for aircraft cargo handling supervisors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors

Michigan

Median salary
$71,250
Mean salary
$66,580
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$74,051
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors page for Michigan →

Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors

Utah

Median salary
$78,990
Mean salary
$74,550
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$79,898
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Cargo Handling Supervisors page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into aircraft cargo handling supervisors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.