Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Aircraft Service Attendants Salary: Michigan vs Tennessee

Aircraft Service Attendants earn a median of $39,440 in Michigan and $55,690 in Tennessee. That is a nominal gap of $16,250 (-29.2%), with Tennessee paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,440
Michigan median
$40,991 after COL
$55,690
Tennessee median
$60,618 after COL
-29.2%
Nominal gap
Tennessee leads
-32.4%
Adjusted gap
Tennessee leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Tennessee pays $16,250 more per year than Michigan for aircraft service attendants, a gap of +29.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Tennessee still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,628 of extra purchasing power (+32.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for aircraft service attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Aircraft Service Attendants

Michigan

Median salary
$39,440
Mean salary
$41,570
Employment
300
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$40,991
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Service Attendants page for Michigan →

Aircraft Service Attendants

Tennessee

Median salary
$55,690
Mean salary
$51,320
Employment
1,060
Location quotient
1.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$60,618
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Service Attendants page for Tennessee →

Related pages

Keep digging into aircraft service attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.