Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Aircraft Service Attendants Salary: Minnesota vs Montana

Aircraft Service Attendants earn a median of $39,920 in Minnesota and $50,750 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $10,830 (-21.3%), with Montana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,920
Minnesota median
$40,478 after COL
$50,750
Montana median
$53,621 after COL
-21.3%
Nominal gap
Montana leads
-24.5%
Adjusted gap
Montana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Montana pays $10,830 more per year than Minnesota for aircraft service attendants, a gap of +21.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Montana still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,143 of extra purchasing power (+24.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for aircraft service attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Aircraft Service Attendants

Minnesota

Median salary
$39,920
Mean salary
$40,610
Employment
900
Location quotient
1.74
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$40,478
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Service Attendants page for Minnesota →

Aircraft Service Attendants

Montana

Median salary
$50,750
Mean salary
$48,960
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$53,621
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aircraft Service Attendants page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into aircraft service attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.