Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Breeders Salary: Alabama vs Minnesota

Animal Breeders earn a median of $29,140 in Alabama and $48,670 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $19,530 (-40.1%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$29,140
Alabama median
$32,807 after COL
$48,670
Minnesota median
$49,351 after COL
-40.1%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-33.5%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $19,530 more per year than Alabama for animal breeders, a gap of +40.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,544 of extra purchasing power (+33.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal breeders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Breeders

Alabama

Median salary
$29,140
Mean salary
$41,540
Employment
50
Location quotient
2.28
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$32,807
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for Alabama →

Animal Breeders

Minnesota

Median salary
$48,670
Mean salary
$49,610
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$49,351
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal breeders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.