Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Control Workers Salary: Iowa vs Nevada

Animal Control Workers earn a median of $48,160 in Iowa and $59,500 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $11,340 (-19.1%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,160
Iowa median
$54,876 after COL
$59,500
Nevada median
$59,512 after COL
-19.1%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-7.8%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $11,340 more per year than Iowa for animal control workers, a gap of +19.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,637 of extra purchasing power (+7.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal control workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Control Workers

Iowa

Median salary
$48,160
Mean salary
$48,470
Employment
130
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$54,876
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for Iowa →

Animal Control Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$59,500
Mean salary
$61,230
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$59,512
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal control workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.