Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Control Workers Salary: Kansas vs Washington

Animal Control Workers earn a median of $43,250 in Kansas and $65,210 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $21,960 (-33.7%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,250
Kansas median
$48,019 after COL
$65,210
Washington median
$60,937 after COL
-33.7%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-21.2%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $21,960 more per year than Kansas for animal control workers, a gap of +33.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,917 of extra purchasing power (+21.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal control workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Control Workers

Kansas

Median salary
$43,250
Mean salary
$44,430
Employment
120
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$48,019
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for Kansas →

Animal Control Workers

Washington

Median salary
$65,210
Mean salary
$64,130
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$60,937
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal control workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.