Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Control Workers Salary: New Mexico vs Oregon

Animal Control Workers earn a median of $36,090 in New Mexico and $66,110 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $30,020 (-45.4%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,090
New Mexico median
$39,138 after COL
$66,110
Oregon median
$63,960 after COL
-45.4%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-38.8%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $30,020 more per year than New Mexico for animal control workers, a gap of +45.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,822 of extra purchasing power (+38.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal control workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Control Workers

New Mexico

Median salary
$36,090
Mean salary
$38,550
Employment
270
Location quotient
4.05
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$39,138
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for New Mexico →

Animal Control Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$66,110
Mean salary
$67,190
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.28
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$63,960
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Control Workers page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal control workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.