Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Scientists Salary: Georgia vs Iowa

Animal Scientists earn a median of $114,560 in Georgia and $95,680 in Iowa. That is a nominal gap of $18,880 (+19.7%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$114,560
Georgia median
$118,970 after COL
$95,680
Iowa median
$109,022 after COL
+19.7%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
+9.1%
Adjusted gap
Georgia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $18,880 more per year than Iowa for animal scientists, a gap of +19.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Georgia still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,948 of extra purchasing power (+9.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Scientists

Georgia

Median salary
$114,560
Mean salary
$110,060
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.74
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$118,970
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Georgia →

Animal Scientists

Iowa

Median salary
$95,680
Mean salary
$109,980
Employment
130
Location quotient
5.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$109,022
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Iowa →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.