Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Scientists Salary: Minnesota vs New York

Animal Scientists earn a median of $138,030 in Minnesota and $87,390 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $50,640 (+57.9%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$138,030
Minnesota median
$139,960 after COL
$87,390
New York median
$80,976 after COL
+57.9%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
+72.8%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $50,640 more per year than New York for animal scientists, a gap of +57.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $58,984 of extra purchasing power (+72.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Scientists

Minnesota

Median salary
$138,030
Mean salary
$130,410
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$139,960
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Minnesota →

Animal Scientists

New York

Median salary
$87,390
Mean salary
$93,510
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$80,976
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.