Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Scientists Salary: Washington vs Missouri

Animal Scientists earn a median of $78,660 in Washington and $119,110 in Missouri. That is a nominal gap of $40,450 (-34.0%), with Missouri paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,660
Washington median
$73,505 after COL
$119,110
Missouri median
$131,154 after COL
-34.0%
Nominal gap
Missouri leads
-44.0%
Adjusted gap
Missouri leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Missouri pays $40,450 more per year than Washington for animal scientists, a gap of +34.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Missouri still comes out ahead, with roughly $57,649 of extra purchasing power (+44.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Scientists

Washington

Median salary
$78,660
Mean salary
$75,560
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$73,505
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Washington →

Animal Scientists

Missouri

Median salary
$119,110
Mean salary
$112,650
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$131,154
Regional Price Parity
90.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Missouri →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.