Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Animal Trainers Salary: Nevada vs Maryland

Animal Trainers earn a median of $36,060 in Nevada and $46,390 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $10,330 (-22.3%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,060
Nevada median
$36,068 after COL
$46,390
Maryland median
$44,198 after COL
-22.3%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-18.4%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $10,330 more per year than Nevada for animal trainers, a gap of +22.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,131 of extra purchasing power (+18.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal trainers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Trainers

Nevada

Median salary
$36,060
Mean salary
$37,790
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$36,068
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for Nevada →

Animal Trainers

Maryland

Median salary
$46,390
Mean salary
$53,470
Employment
600
Location quotient
1.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$44,198
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal trainers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.