Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Anthropologists And Archeologists Salary: Nevada vs Hawaii

Anthropologists And Archeologists earn a median of $72,820 in Nevada and $88,390 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $15,570 (-17.6%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$72,820
Nevada median
$72,835 after COL
$88,390
Hawaii median
$80,390 after COL
-17.6%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-9.4%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $15,570 more per year than Nevada for anthropologists and archeologists, a gap of +17.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,555 of extra purchasing power (+9.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for anthropologists and archeologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Anthropologists And Archeologists

Nevada

Median salary
$72,820
Mean salary
$73,490
Employment
200
Location quotient
2.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$72,835
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Anthropologists And Archeologists page for Nevada →

Anthropologists And Archeologists

Hawaii

Median salary
$88,390
Mean salary
$95,530
Employment
150
Location quotient
4.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$80,390
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Anthropologists And Archeologists page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into anthropologists and archeologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.