Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Astronomers Salary: Arizona vs Hawaii

Astronomers earn a median of $125,480 in Arizona and $103,000 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $22,480 (+21.8%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$125,480
Arizona median
$124,636 after COL
$103,000
Hawaii median
$93,678 after COL
+21.8%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
+33.0%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $22,480 more per year than Hawaii for astronomers, a gap of +21.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,958 of extra purchasing power (+33.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for astronomers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Astronomers

Arizona

Median salary
$125,480
Mean salary
$131,990
Employment
90
Location quotient
2.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$124,636
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Astronomers page for Arizona →

Astronomers

Hawaii

Median salary
$103,000
Mean salary
$98,800
Employment
140
Location quotient
21.95
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$93,678
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Astronomers page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into astronomers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.