Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Athletes And Sports Competitors Salary: Kentucky vs Connecticut

Athletes And Sports Competitors earn a median of $57,060 in Kentucky and $84,460 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $27,400 (-32.4%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,060
Kentucky median
$63,288 after COL
$84,460
Connecticut median
$81,517 after COL
-32.4%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-22.4%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $27,400 more per year than Kentucky for athletes and sports competitors, a gap of +32.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,229 of extra purchasing power (+22.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for athletes and sports competitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Kentucky

Median salary
$57,060
Mean salary
$64,590
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$63,288
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Kentucky →

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Connecticut

Median salary
$84,460
Mean salary
$108,700
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$81,517
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into athletes and sports competitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.