Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Audiologists Salary: Pennsylvania vs California

Audiologists earn a median of $87,210 in Pennsylvania and $123,600 in California. That is a nominal gap of $36,390 (-29.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$87,210
Pennsylvania median
$89,380 after COL
$123,600
California median
$111,633 after COL
-29.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
-19.9%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $36,390 more per year than Pennsylvania for audiologists, a gap of +29.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,253 of extra purchasing power (+19.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for audiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Audiologists

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$87,210
Mean salary
$94,320
Employment
780
Location quotient
1.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$89,380
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Audiologists page for Pennsylvania →

Audiologists

California

Median salary
$123,600
Mean salary
$119,900
Employment
1,370
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$111,633
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Audiologists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into audiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.