Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Bartenders Salary: Wisconsin vs Vermont

Bartenders earn a median of $22,520 in Wisconsin and $54,310 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $31,790 (-58.5%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$22,520
Wisconsin median
$23,933 after COL
$54,310
Vermont median
$55,442 after COL
-58.5%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-56.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $31,790 more per year than Wisconsin for bartenders, a gap of +58.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $31,509 of extra purchasing power (+56.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bartenders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bartenders

Wisconsin

Median salary
$22,520
Mean salary
$26,210
Employment
29,340
Location quotient
2.08
Jobs per 1,000
10.0
COL-adjusted median
$23,933
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for Wisconsin →

Bartenders

Vermont

Median salary
$54,310
Mean salary
$59,680
Employment
2,210
Location quotient
1.50
Jobs per 1,000
7.3
COL-adjusted median
$55,442
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into bartenders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.