Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Bill And Account Collectors Salary: Jackson, MS vs Napa, CA

Bill And Account Collectors earn a median of $41,170 in Jackson, MS and $66,940 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $25,770 (-38.5%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$41,170
Jackson, MS median
$46,233 after COL
$66,940
Napa, CA median
$59,474 after COL
-38.5%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-22.3%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $25,770 more per year than Jackson, MS for bill and account collectors, a gap of +38.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,240 of extra purchasing power (+22.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bill and account collectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bill And Account Collectors

Jackson, MS

Median salary
$41,170
Mean salary
$44,150
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$46,233
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Bill And Account Collectors page for Jackson, MS →

Bill And Account Collectors

Napa, CA

Median salary
$66,940
Mean salary
$70,840
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$59,474
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Bill And Account Collectors page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into bill and account collectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.