Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Budget Analysts Salary: Massachusetts vs Virginia

Budget Analysts earn a median of $88,270 in Massachusetts and $108,740 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $20,470 (-18.8%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$88,270
Massachusetts median
$83,465 after COL
$108,740
Virginia median
$107,553 after COL
-18.8%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-22.4%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $20,470 more per year than Massachusetts for budget analysts, a gap of +18.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,088 of extra purchasing power (+22.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for budget analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Budget Analysts

Massachusetts

Median salary
$88,270
Mean salary
$94,370
Employment
1,380
Location quotient
1.24
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$83,465
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Massachusetts →

Budget Analysts

Virginia

Median salary
$108,740
Mean salary
$111,720
Employment
2,940
Location quotient
2.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$107,553
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into budget analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.