Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Budget Analysts Salary: Utah vs Alabama

Budget Analysts earn a median of $80,420 in Utah and $98,080 in Alabama. That is a nominal gap of $17,660 (-18.0%), with Alabama paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,420
Utah median
$81,344 after COL
$98,080
Alabama median
$110,422 after COL
-18.0%
Nominal gap
Alabama leads
-26.3%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alabama pays $17,660 more per year than Utah for budget analysts, a gap of +18.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alabama still comes out ahead, with roughly $29,078 of extra purchasing power (+26.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for budget analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Budget Analysts

Utah

Median salary
$80,420
Mean salary
$83,730
Employment
380
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$81,344
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Utah →

Budget Analysts

Alabama

Median salary
$98,080
Mean salary
$99,700
Employment
940
Location quotient
1.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$110,422
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Alabama →

Related pages

Keep digging into budget analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.