Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Budget Analysts Salary: Utah vs New Mexico

Budget Analysts earn a median of $80,420 in Utah and $99,590 in New Mexico. That is a nominal gap of $19,170 (-19.2%), with New Mexico paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,420
Utah median
$81,344 after COL
$99,590
New Mexico median
$108,001 after COL
-19.2%
Nominal gap
New Mexico leads
-24.7%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Mexico pays $19,170 more per year than Utah for budget analysts, a gap of +19.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Mexico still comes out ahead, with roughly $26,657 of extra purchasing power (+24.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for budget analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Budget Analysts

Utah

Median salary
$80,420
Mean salary
$83,730
Employment
380
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$81,344
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Utah →

Budget Analysts

New Mexico

Median salary
$99,590
Mean salary
$96,610
Employment
710
Location quotient
2.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$108,001
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for New Mexico →

Related pages

Keep digging into budget analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.