Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Bus Drivers, School Salary: Oregon vs Massachusetts

Bus Drivers, School earn a median of $52,090 in Oregon and $63,030 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $10,940 (-17.4%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,090
Oregon median
$50,396 after COL
$63,030
Massachusetts median
$59,599 after COL
-17.4%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-15.4%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $10,940 more per year than Oregon for bus drivers, school, a gap of +17.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,203 of extra purchasing power (+15.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, school in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, School

Oregon

Median salary
$52,090
Mean salary
$55,070
Employment
4,460
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
2.3
COL-adjusted median
$50,396
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, School page for Oregon →

Bus Drivers, School

Massachusetts

Median salary
$63,030
Mean salary
$58,100
Employment
10,240
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$59,599
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, School page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, school from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.