Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: Arizona vs Washington

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $48,660 in Arizona and $70,360 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $21,700 (-30.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,660
Arizona median
$48,333 after COL
$70,360
Washington median
$65,749 after COL
-30.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-26.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $21,700 more per year than Arizona for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +30.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,416 of extra purchasing power (+26.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Arizona

Median salary
$48,660
Mean salary
$51,510
Employment
2,850
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$48,333
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Arizona →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Washington

Median salary
$70,360
Mean salary
$71,670
Employment
7,100
Location quotient
2.08
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$65,749
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.