Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: Oregon vs Hawaii

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $62,900 in Oregon and $69,090 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $6,190 (-9.0%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,900
Oregon median
$60,855 after COL
$69,090
Hawaii median
$62,837 after COL
-9.0%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-3.2%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $6,190 more per year than Oregon for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +9.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,982 of extra purchasing power (+3.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Oregon

Median salary
$62,900
Mean salary
$62,780
Employment
2,730
Location quotient
1.44
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$60,855
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Oregon →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Hawaii

Median salary
$69,090
Mean salary
$61,300
Employment
2,130
Location quotient
3.56
Jobs per 1,000
3.4
COL-adjusted median
$62,837
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.