Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Carpet Installers Salary: Mississippi vs Alaska

Carpet Installers earn a median of $37,700 in Mississippi and $61,040 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $23,340 (-38.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,700
Mississippi median
$43,357 after COL
$61,040
Alaska median
$59,633 after COL
-38.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-27.3%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $23,340 more per year than Mississippi for carpet installers, a gap of +38.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,276 of extra purchasing power (+27.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for carpet installers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Carpet Installers

Mississippi

Median salary
$37,700
Mean salary
$37,330
Employment
130
Location quotient
1.14
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$43,357
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpet Installers page for Mississippi →

Carpet Installers

Alaska

Median salary
$61,040
Mean salary
$60,310
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.33
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$59,633
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpet Installers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into carpet installers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.