Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cashiers Salary: District of Columbia vs Alaska

Cashiers earn a median of $37,540 in District of Columbia and $36,050 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $1,490 (+4.1%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,540
District of Columbia median
$34,158 after COL
$36,050
Alaska median
$35,219 after COL
+4.1%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-3.0%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $1,490 more per year than Alaska for cashiers, a gap of +4.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,061 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cashiers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cashiers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$37,540
Mean salary
$40,660
Employment
7,310
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
10.3
COL-adjusted median
$34,158
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for District of Columbia →

Cashiers

Alaska

Median salary
$36,050
Mean salary
$35,940
Employment
5,950
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
18.5
COL-adjusted median
$35,219
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into cashiers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.