Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cashiers Salary: Michigan vs Colorado

Cashiers earn a median of $29,190 in Michigan and $35,760 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $6,570 (-18.4%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$29,190
Michigan median
$30,338 after COL
$35,760
Colorado median
$34,701 after COL
-18.4%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-12.6%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $6,570 more per year than Michigan for cashiers, a gap of +18.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,363 of extra purchasing power (+12.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cashiers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cashiers

Michigan

Median salary
$29,190
Mean salary
$30,160
Employment
89,450
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
20.4
COL-adjusted median
$30,338
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Michigan →

Cashiers

Colorado

Median salary
$35,760
Mean salary
$36,500
Employment
55,700
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
19.3
COL-adjusted median
$34,701
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into cashiers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.