Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Chemical Engineers Salary: Minnesota vs New Mexico

Chemical Engineers earn a median of $114,060 in Minnesota and $147,290 in New Mexico. That is a nominal gap of $33,230 (-22.6%), with New Mexico paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$114,060
Minnesota median
$115,655 after COL
$147,290
New Mexico median
$159,730 after COL
-22.6%
Nominal gap
New Mexico leads
-27.6%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Mexico pays $33,230 more per year than Minnesota for chemical engineers, a gap of +22.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Mexico still comes out ahead, with roughly $44,075 of extra purchasing power (+27.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemical engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemical Engineers

Minnesota

Median salary
$114,060
Mean salary
$135,060
Employment
180
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$115,655
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Engineers page for Minnesota →

Chemical Engineers

New Mexico

Median salary
$147,290
Mean salary
$150,610
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$159,730
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Engineers page for New Mexico →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemical engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.