Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Chemical Plant And System Operators Salary: Wyoming vs Kentucky

Chemical Plant And System Operators earn a median of $104,420 in Wyoming and $98,890 in Kentucky. That is a nominal gap of $5,530 (+5.6%), with Wyoming paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$104,420
Wyoming median
$112,654 after COL
$98,890
Kentucky median
$109,684 after COL
+5.6%
Nominal gap
Wyoming leads
+2.7%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wyoming pays $5,530 more per year than Kentucky for chemical plant and system operators, a gap of +5.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wyoming still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,970 of extra purchasing power (+2.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemical plant and system operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemical Plant And System Operators

Wyoming

Median salary
$104,420
Mean salary
$100,150
Employment
320
Location quotient
9.92
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$112,654
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Plant And System Operators page for Wyoming →

Chemical Plant And System Operators

Kentucky

Median salary
$98,890
Mean salary
$97,230
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$109,684
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Plant And System Operators page for Kentucky →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemical plant and system operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.