Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Chemical Technicians Salary: Minnesota vs Colorado

Chemical Technicians earn a median of $54,340 in Minnesota and $64,540 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $10,200 (-15.8%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,340
Minnesota median
$55,100 after COL
$64,540
Colorado median
$62,629 after COL
-15.8%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-12.0%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $10,200 more per year than Minnesota for chemical technicians, a gap of +15.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,529 of extra purchasing power (+12.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemical technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemical Technicians

Minnesota

Median salary
$54,340
Mean salary
$59,090
Employment
730
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$55,100
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Technicians page for Minnesota →

Chemical Technicians

Colorado

Median salary
$64,540
Mean salary
$68,260
Employment
1,140
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$62,629
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemical Technicians page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemical technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.