Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Utah vs Kansas

Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $105,090 in Utah and $110,810 in Kansas. That is a nominal gap of $5,720 (-5.2%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$105,090
Utah median
$106,298 after COL
$110,810
Kansas median
$123,029 after COL
-5.2%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
-13.6%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $5,720 more per year than Utah for chemistry teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +5.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,732 of extra purchasing power (+13.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemistry teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary

Utah

Median salary
$105,090
Mean salary
$117,700
Employment
280
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$106,298
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary page for Utah →

Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary

Kansas

Median salary
$110,810
Mean salary
$112,260
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$123,029
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary page for Kansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemistry teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.