Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Chemists Salary: Vermont vs Maryland

Chemists earn a median of $81,460 in Vermont and $131,910 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $50,450 (-38.2%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,460
Vermont median
$83,158 after COL
$131,910
Maryland median
$125,678 after COL
-38.2%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-33.8%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $50,450 more per year than Vermont for chemists, a gap of +38.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $42,520 of extra purchasing power (+33.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemists

Vermont

Median salary
$81,460
Mean salary
$91,110
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$83,158
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemists page for Vermont →

Chemists

Maryland

Median salary
$131,910
Mean salary
$132,260
Employment
3,000
Location quotient
2.02
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$125,678
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemists page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.