Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Childcare Workers Salary: Kansas vs Vermont

Childcare Workers earn a median of $28,800 in Kansas and $37,830 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $9,030 (-23.9%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$28,800
Kansas median
$31,976 after COL
$37,830
Vermont median
$38,619 after COL
-23.9%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-17.2%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $9,030 more per year than Kansas for childcare workers, a gap of +23.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,643 of extra purchasing power (+17.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for childcare workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Childcare Workers

Kansas

Median salary
$28,800
Mean salary
$29,260
Employment
7,180
Location quotient
1.49
Jobs per 1,000
5.0
COL-adjusted median
$31,976
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Kansas →

Childcare Workers

Vermont

Median salary
$37,830
Mean salary
$39,370
Employment
1,120
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
3.7
COL-adjusted median
$38,619
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into childcare workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.