Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Childcare Workers Salary: Montana vs Massachusetts

Childcare Workers earn a median of $31,440 in Montana and $39,290 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $7,850 (-20.0%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$31,440
Montana median
$33,219 after COL
$39,290
Massachusetts median
$37,151 after COL
-20.0%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-10.6%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $7,850 more per year than Montana for childcare workers, a gap of +20.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,932 of extra purchasing power (+10.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for childcare workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Childcare Workers

Montana

Median salary
$31,440
Mean salary
$32,450
Employment
2,070
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
4.1
COL-adjusted median
$33,219
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Montana →

Childcare Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$39,290
Mean salary
$41,350
Employment
12,370
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
3.4
COL-adjusted median
$37,151
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into childcare workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.