Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Childcare Workers Salary: Oklahoma vs Washington

Childcare Workers earn a median of $26,210 in Oklahoma and $37,800 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $11,590 (-30.7%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$26,210
Oklahoma median
$29,837 after COL
$37,800
Washington median
$35,323 after COL
-30.7%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-15.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $11,590 more per year than Oklahoma for childcare workers, a gap of +30.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,485 of extra purchasing power (+15.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for childcare workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Childcare Workers

Oklahoma

Median salary
$26,210
Mean salary
$27,460
Employment
9,550
Location quotient
1.67
Jobs per 1,000
5.6
COL-adjusted median
$29,837
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Oklahoma →

Childcare Workers

Washington

Median salary
$37,800
Mean salary
$40,660
Employment
4,300
Location quotient
0.36
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$35,323
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Childcare Workers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into childcare workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.