Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Choreographers Salary: Virginia vs North Carolina

Choreographers earn a median of $44,740 in Virginia and $79,630 in North Carolina. That is a nominal gap of $34,890 (-43.8%), with North Carolina paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,740
Virginia median
$44,251 after COL
$79,630
North Carolina median
$84,420 after COL
-43.8%
Nominal gap
North Carolina leads
-47.6%
Adjusted gap
North Carolina leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Carolina pays $34,890 more per year than Virginia for choreographers, a gap of +43.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Carolina still comes out ahead, with roughly $40,169 of extra purchasing power (+47.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for choreographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Choreographers

Virginia

Median salary
$44,740
Mean salary
$46,730
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$44,251
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for Virginia →

Choreographers

North Carolina

Median salary
$79,630
Mean salary
$73,630
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$84,420
Regional Price Parity
94.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for North Carolina →

Related pages

Keep digging into choreographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.