Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Civil Engineers Salary: Birmingham, AL vs Napa, CA

Civil Engineers earn a median of $93,210 in Birmingham, AL and $122,820 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $29,610 (-24.1%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$93,210
Birmingham, AL median
$101,709 after COL
$122,820
Napa, CA median
$109,121 after COL
-24.1%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-6.8%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $29,610 more per year than Birmingham, AL for civil engineers, a gap of +24.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,412 of extra purchasing power (+6.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for civil engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Civil Engineers

Birmingham, AL

Median salary
$93,210
Mean salary
$103,400
Employment
1,430
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$101,709
Regional Price Parity
91.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Civil Engineers page for Birmingham, AL →

Civil Engineers

Napa, CA

Median salary
$122,820
Mean salary
$124,810
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$109,121
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Civil Engineers page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into civil engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.