Skip to content
uswages .org

Civil Engineers Salary: Oregon vs Massachusetts

Civil Engineers earn a median of $105,250 in Oregon and $106,730 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $1,480 (-1.4%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$105,250
Oregon median
$101,828 after COL
$106,730
Massachusetts median
$100,920 after COL
-1.4%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+0.9%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $1,480 more per year than Oregon for civil engineers, a gap of +1.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $908 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for civil engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Civil Engineers

Oregon

Median salary
$105,250
Mean salary
$116,160
Employment
4,890
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
2.5
COL-adjusted median
$101,828
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Civil Engineers page for Oregon →

Civil Engineers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$106,730
Mean salary
$117,330
Employment
9,450
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$100,920
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Civil Engineers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into civil engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.