Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Community Health Workers Salary: Arizona vs Nevada

Community Health Workers earn a median of $48,050 in Arizona and $57,380 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $9,330 (-16.3%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,050
Arizona median
$47,727 after COL
$57,380
Nevada median
$57,392 after COL
-16.3%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-16.8%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $9,330 more per year than Arizona for community health workers, a gap of +16.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,665 of extra purchasing power (+16.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

Arizona

Median salary
$48,050
Mean salary
$51,260
Employment
1,160
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$47,727
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Arizona →

Community Health Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$57,380
Mean salary
$64,920
Employment
550
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$57,392
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.