Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Community Health Workers Salary: Hawaii vs New Mexico

Community Health Workers earn a median of $53,480 in Hawaii and $71,210 in New Mexico. That is a nominal gap of $17,730 (-24.9%), with New Mexico paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$53,480
Hawaii median
$48,640 after COL
$71,210
New Mexico median
$77,224 after COL
-24.9%
Nominal gap
New Mexico leads
-37.0%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Mexico pays $17,730 more per year than Hawaii for community health workers, a gap of +24.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Mexico still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,584 of extra purchasing power (+37.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

Hawaii

Median salary
$53,480
Mean salary
$54,280
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$48,640
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Hawaii →

Community Health Workers

New Mexico

Median salary
$71,210
Mean salary
$69,490
Employment
930
Location quotient
2.75
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$77,224
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for New Mexico →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.