Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Community Health Workers Salary: Nebraska vs Connecticut

Community Health Workers earn a median of $51,900 in Nebraska and $59,480 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $7,580 (-12.7%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$51,900
Nebraska median
$57,601 after COL
$59,480
Connecticut median
$57,408 after COL
-12.7%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
+0.3%
Adjusted gap
Nebraska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $7,580 more per year than Nebraska for community health workers, a gap of +12.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nebraska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $193 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

Nebraska

Median salary
$51,900
Mean salary
$54,980
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$57,601
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Nebraska →

Community Health Workers

Connecticut

Median salary
$59,480
Mean salary
$62,800
Employment
590
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$57,408
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.