Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Compliance Officers Salary: Iowa vs California

Compliance Officers earn a median of $73,530 in Iowa and $92,350 in California. That is a nominal gap of $18,820 (-20.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,530
Iowa median
$83,783 after COL
$92,350
California median
$83,409 after COL
-20.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
+0.4%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $18,820 more per year than Iowa for compliance officers, a gap of +20.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Iowa actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $375 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.4% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for compliance officers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Compliance Officers

Iowa

Median salary
$73,530
Mean salary
$76,440
Employment
3,410
Location quotient
0.85
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$83,783
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compliance Officers page for Iowa →

Compliance Officers

California

Median salary
$92,350
Mean salary
$98,970
Employment
47,420
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$83,409
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compliance Officers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into compliance officers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.